Jeffery Veen: "State-of-the-Art-Interactivity"
1. Congratulations! You’re a judge for agency/film flash sites, but you do need to judge how you advertise your own flash ideas. You’re entire article is all about how artists present their flash sites in order to convey an idea (or advertisement) and what you thought was poor about them (as a whole). The real way to critique these words would be to convey your problem with the flash and then GIVE EXAMPLES FOR PROPER (or what you think is proper) INSIGHT for getting the job done right. Through your entire article you rant and rave about what interactivity was back in the day. Step up to the plate and show us (your audience) what your years (I had to seek out your background off a different site which you linked to) of knowledge and experience has taught you.
I did see that you are a deeply sought after speaker, so I KNOW you know how to present ideas…you just need to incorporate that into your website instead of just your job (as a speaker).
As it was mentioned in some of the comments to your article, a lot of these flash site are targeted to the majority of the money shoveling drones of society. Three colorful flashes of light have them giggling like school girls and wanting more giggly fun. To these people loud noises and movable icons are the highlights of their hours of surfing. I, personally, LOVE Choose your adventure web pieces it brings the childhood pastime back into the modern adult life. Call me simple, hell call me easily amused, I just write this to represent the simpletons out in the world. That’s all.
Load screens: Yeah, I can’t really knock you on that. I’ve seen some load screens that I just left the site before 10%. But I suppose as a judge leaving the site isn’t an option.
User-centered design vs. marketing and image. THAT statement isn’t written write at all. It should be
User-centered design =marketing and image because THAT’S why they were designed FOR the USER to BOLSTER marketing and the image of a company.
Josual Davis I…I don’t even know what he does! I open the page and see tones of gray everywhere. My first thoughts were, “Oh neat it’s a click-happy site.” Soooo…I click a city. Nothing happened. I click another…and nothing. I then click on some link in the side bar and learn that the map is a TRACKING map. You can track where he is. “HA HA! COOL! He’s a…” I still can’t figure what he does! He travels apparently. I then spot
Workshopsand the word
…course. Thus I conclude he is a teacher…I think. Actually I’m sure of that…now.
I don’t think the site represents what he DOES and it sure doesn’t YELL flash or anything (not that flash sites SHOULD yell that). Interactivity=good. It’s pretty interactive for a website but flash can do MORE that just what’s on this site. Flash MOVES things. It fades things in and out. It scales, rotates, loads graphics (purely off data alone).
All that has been stated were my thought before scrolling WAY down. This doesn’t CHANGE my statements; in fact I have more to say. The MAJOR flash portion of this site is tucked away TIGHTLY and neatly where the user has no CLUE it exists. I only found the links when I squinted and noticed the stereotypical scroll symbols on the scroll bar. I had to squint because all the tones of gray blur together (and I need glasses anyway). Clicking ON the flash links brings up this abstract, pseudo standard-windows-screensaver art. Again I say….flash can do MORE than just swirl images about to tessellate art.
My part words (lines):
1. WORK FLASH! If you work it…it works for you!
2. BORDERS!!! Everything fills the window top to bottom and I keep wanting to scroll up so see some evidence of containment.